July 5

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Experiments)
(Experiments)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Back to [[Bangalore]]
+
Back to ''[[Bangalore]]''
-
Back to [[e-Notebook]]
+
Back to ''[[e-Notebook]]''
 +
==Experiments==
Line 22: Line 23:
iii)The flask having cells with OD=0.193 was filtered out.
iii)The flask having cells with OD=0.193 was filtered out.
-
iv) 7 dilutions with full IPTG range were made for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio.
+
* 7 dilutions with full IPTG conc range were made for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio.
 +
** -ve control: K12z1 in AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio
 +
** +ve control: pL.Y, 100 uM IPTG, 1x M9
-
 
-
**-ve control: K12z1 in AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio
 
-
 
-
**+ve control: pL.Y, 100 uM IPTG, 1x M9
 
* To show that K12z1 does not produce any chemical in M9+aTc which might affect the system, we compared the CFP/YFP expressions of the following 2 samples:   
* To show that K12z1 does not produce any chemical in M9+aTc which might affect the system, we compared the CFP/YFP expressions of the following 2 samples:   
-
 
** pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in Glu M9 with 500 uM IPTG, and  
** pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in Glu M9 with 500 uM IPTG, and  
-
 
** K12Z1 was grown in 1 ng/mL aTc and the cells were filtered out. This medium was then diluted with 2xGlu M9 in a 1:1 ratio, and pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in it with 500 uM IPTG.  
** K12Z1 was grown in 1 ng/mL aTc and the cells were filtered out. This medium was then diluted with 2xGlu M9 in a 1:1 ratio, and pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in it with 500 uM IPTG.  
Line 49: Line 46:
* Open loop samples [Ff] were imaged.
* Open loop samples [Ff] were imaged.
 +
 +
 +
==Analysis==

Latest revision as of 11:28, 6 July 2007

Back to Bangalore

Back to e-Notebook

Experiments

  • Open Loop [Cc]

i) Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with 5 ng/mL [aTc] and 1,0.1 uL/mL of inoculum.

ii) K12z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=5 ng/mL and 0.5,0.05 uL/mL of inoculum.

iii) However, right OD was not reached in time and this would be repeated.


  • Open Loop [Dd]

i)Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with [aTc]=1 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL.

ii) K12z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=1 ng/mL and inoculum=0.5,0.05 uL/mL.

iii)The flask having cells with OD=0.193 was filtered out.

  • 7 dilutions with full IPTG conc range were made for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio.
    • -ve control: K12z1 in AI from 1 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio
    • +ve control: pL.Y, 100 uM IPTG, 1x M9


  • To show that K12z1 does not produce any chemical in M9+aTc which might affect the system, we compared the CFP/YFP expressions of the following 2 samples:
    • pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in Glu M9 with 500 uM IPTG, and
    • K12Z1 was grown in 1 ng/mL aTc and the cells were filtered out. This medium was then diluted with 2xGlu M9 in a 1:1 ratio, and pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C was inoculated in it with 500 uM IPTG.


  • pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C, K12z1, pL.Y were Inoculated in LB
  • pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C and K12z1 were inoculated in LB.
  • pT.LuxI.C, K12Z1 were inoculated in LB for open loop duplicate expts [Ee] and [Cc].


Microscopy

  • Open loop samples [Aa] were imaged.
  • Open loop samples [Ff] were imaged.


Analysis