June 13

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Experiments)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
* Negative control (K12Z1) in three sets (after 5 hrs).
* Negative control (K12Z1) in three sets (after 5 hrs).
-
* 0.01,0.1 and 1 uL of inoculated pL LuxI CFP diluted in M9:  M9+ 1000 uM IPTG (1 ml)
+
* 0.01,0.1 and 1 uL of inoculated pL luxI cfp inoculated in M9 in sets of three :
-
                                                              M9+ 50 ng/mL ATC  (1 mL)
+
{| align="center"
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
  M9+ 1000 uM IPTG (1 mL)
 +
M9+ 50 ng/mL ATC  (1 mL)
 +
|}
 +
'''Microscopy'''
 +
* pT LuxI CFP (J22241) induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.
 +
 +
* K12Z1 induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.
-
'''Microscopy'''
 
-
* pT LuxI CFP (J22241) induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.  
+
'''Note:''' There was a problem in the Flow Cytometer (FACS) sheath pressure and the filters were found misaligned. Thus fluorescence readings were not proper and we would take the FACS readings again.
-
         
+
-
* K12Z1 also induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL  and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.
+

Latest revision as of 12:14, 29 June 2007

Back to Bangalore

Back to e-Notebook

Experiments

  • Flow cytometry carried out.
  • pL CFP (J22202) induced with IPTG for 0,1,10,50,100,1000 uM after 5 hours in sets of three.
  • pL CFP (J22202) induced with ATc for 0,1,10,25,50,100 ng/mL after 4 hrs in sets of three.
  • pL YFP (J22203) induced with IPTG for 1000uM in three sets after 4 hrs (positive control).
  • Negative control (K12Z1) in three sets (after 5 hrs).
  • 0.01,0.1 and 1 uL of inoculated pL luxI cfp inoculated in M9 in sets of three :
M9+ 1000 uM IPTG  (1 mL)
M9+ 50 ng/mL ATC  (1 mL)

Microscopy

  • pT LuxI CFP (J22241) induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.
  • K12Z1 induced with aTc at 0,10,100 ng/mL and imaging done after 6,8,10 hrs.


Note: There was a problem in the Flow Cytometer (FACS) sheath pressure and the filters were found misaligned. Thus fluorescence readings were not proper and we would take the FACS readings again.