Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(HtrII Analysis)
(ComP Analysis)
Line 167: Line 167:
evidence for HAMP domain
evidence for HAMP domain
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP HAMP| ComP HAMP ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP HAMP| ComP HAMP ]]
-
[[Image:comP_HAMP.jpg| ComP HAMP]]  
+
 
 +
transmembrane prediction conferes with this as follows
 +
 
 +
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP TM| ComP TM ]]
 +
 
same alignment as for HtrII above, it is likely that the gaps are loops. We will account for this in the fusion variants.
same alignment as for HtrII above, it is likely that the gaps are loops. We will account for this in the fusion variants.
evidence for kinase
evidence for kinase
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Kinase| ComP Kinase ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Kinase| ComP Kinase ]]
-
[[Image:comP_kinase.jpg| ComP Kinase]]
+
 
confers with GenBank analysis below
confers with GenBank analysis below
Line 181: Line 185:
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Helix Turn Propensity| ComP Helix Turn Propensity ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Helix Turn Propensity| ComP Helix Turn Propensity ]]
-
[[Image:comP_helix-prop.jpg| ComP Helix Turn Propensity]]
+
 
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Turn Propensity| ComP Turn Propensity ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Turn Propensity| ComP Turn Propensity ]]
-
[[Image:comP_turn-prop.jpg| ComP Turn Propensity]]
+
 
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Hydrophobicity| ComP Hydrophobicity ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ComP Hydrophobicity| ComP Hydrophobicity ]]
-
[[Image:comP_hydrophob.jpg| ComP Hydrophobicity]]
+
 
also refer to direct aligment between comP and HtrII helical regions
also refer to direct aligment between comP and HtrII helical regions
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ comparision| ComP / HtrII Comparison of helical regions ]]
* [[Melbourne/Blue Photosensor Background/ comparision| ComP / HtrII Comparison of helical regions ]]
-
[[Image:comP_HtrII_MCP-comp.jpg| ComP / HtrII Comparison of helical regions]]
+
 

Revision as of 09:22, 7 August 2007

<return to top of background> <return to home page>

The background to the design of the blue photosensor is included here. Specifically the design for the chimeric fusion protein that will be the key link in blue light pathway


Contents

Preliminaries

Restriction Site Analysis - NEB cutter

Sequence Translation - Translate

Sequence Aligment - JalView These were done via known domain databases from GenBank, with a ClustalW Realignment option in the Web Services menu of JalView

PCR primer design - NetPrimer

Transmembrane Prediction - DAS Transmembrane Prediction

JalView File of Seq. Alignments - doesn't work ATM

Sequences and Restriction Sites

SopII

sensory rhodopsin II

DNA, AA, genbank

  • No IGEM restriction sites
  • HaeII (@168) present


HtrII

sensory rhodopsin II transducer

DNA, AA, genbank

  • No IGEM restriction sites
  • No useful restriction site


SopII/HtrII fusion

DNA, AA (frame 2 in Translate - only SopII + HtrII + Linker included in link), linker = TSASA SNGASA,

genbank

  • No IGEM restriction sites
  • Use site from SopII (this is the one that will be used)


ComP

two-component sensor histidine kinase

DNA (includes IGEM forward and reverse primers (VF2 + VR) and IGEM prefix and suffix, AA, genbank

SpeI (@927) deleted HaeII (@1902) inserted


ComA

sensory rhodopsin II transducer

DNA, AA, genbank

SpeI (@12) deleted HaeII (@433) inserted


Chimera Design

Overview

Refer to 4 PCR primer method here, 2001 paper get picture


SopII Analysis

transmembrane photoreceptor, requires all-trans retinal as substrate... linked to HtrII insert TM analysis here. reference the three papers cited in background

This shows consistent TM helicies throughout the whole sequence

HtrII Analysis

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCP) are hypothesized to be modular in structure (ref needed). This modularity and homology between most MCPs is evidence by the clear separation of HAMP domains from methyl-accepting helical domains and the sensor kinases. Below is shown evidence for this in HtrII.


This hisitidine kinase also has a clear TM region, from residues 0-80


Genbank mentions the HAMP domain (Histidine kinases, Adenylyl cyclases, Methyl binding proteins, Phosphatases)

This is the key to the propagation of the excitation signal according to (ref needed)

Evidence for the HAMP domain is contained in the following sequence alignment with known HAMP domains from GenBank


evidence for HAMP domain. Alignment suggest homogoly from residue 65 to 134. This conforms with the GenBank analysis shown belown


evidence for methyl-accepting chemo-taxis like domain (these are the likely helices (hydrophobic residue every 7 AA, after the HAMP domain)


The above clearly suggest that HtrII follows the modular structure. The helical domains are evidence by the hydrophobic (blue) residues, that occur every 7-8 residues. This begins at residues 210 in the sequence (EVMDR), which is simliar to the GenBank Analysis


This is further shown by looking at the hydrophicity traces below. Although the consistency of the 7-8 repeat of hydrophobic residue depends on helix turn propensity



GenBank Analysis

COG5000 Location:99–249 Blast Score:90 NtrY; Signal transduction histidine kinase involved in nitrogen fixation and metabolism regulation [Signal transduction mechanisms]

smart00283 Location:239–446 Blast Score:277 MA; Methyl-accepting chemotaxis-like domains (chemotaxis sensory transducer). Thought to undergo reversible methylation in response to attractants or repellants during bacterial chemotaxis.

pfam00672 Location:99–133 Blast Score:85 HAMP; HAMP domain.


imply that the design with tsr worked as this was also a MCP (probably don't need to give evidence for this)


evidence for the kinase

ComP Analysis

evidence for HAMP domain

transmembrane prediction conferes with this as follows

same alignment as for HtrII above, it is likely that the gaps are loops. We will account for this in the fusion variants.

evidence for kinase


confers with GenBank analysis below


evidence for methylated (or accepting) helices... analysis based on region between HAMP domain and kinase (between residues KNTILD| and |MFAEIK)


also refer to direct aligment between comP and HtrII helical regions


GenBank Analysis cd00075 Location:681–767 Blast Score:129 HATPase_c; Histidine kinase-like ATPases; This family includes several ATP-binding proteins for example: histidine kinase, DNA gyrase B, topoisomerases, heat shock protein HSP90, phytochrome-like ATPases and DNA mismatch repair proteins pfam07730 Location:568–638 Blast Score:138 HisKA_3; Histidine kinase. This is the dimerisation and phosphoacceptor domain of a sub-family of histidine kinases. It shares sequence similarity with pfam00512 and pfam07536.

Chosen Fusion Sites

from the paper we chose the were roughly at the start, middle, end of the HAMP domain ...

File:Seq align.jpg Media:Example.ogg