Imperial/Wet Lab/Lab Notebook/2007-10-05

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: Line 5:
 +
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vivo==
 +
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vivo
 +
*The protocols for the experiment can be found [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Wet Lab/Protocols/ID1.1|here]]
 +
*The [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/new pages/in vivo|results]] of the test showed that pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b is working in vivo and GFPmut3b produced increases with increasing [AHL]
 +
 +
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vitro==
 +
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vitro, for a number of concentrations of AHL
 +
*The protocols for the experiment can be found [[IGEM:here|here]]
 +
*The [[Media:IC 2007 PLux in-vitro 05-10 25oC.xls|results]] of the test seemed very variable and didn't seemed to comply with the tests that were carried out before. There was a lot of variability between the samples and 4nM of AHL seemed to have fluorescence output greater than 50nM.
 +
*It was decided to carry out the experiment again. The reasons for the inaccuracies in the data could have been:
 +
**The reaction was not mixed properly or the right amounts were not pipetted
 +
**The plates had already been used and thus could have affected the reaction
<html></div></html>
<html></div></html>
{{Template:IC07labnotebook}}
{{Template:IC07labnotebook}}

Revision as of 19:43, 24 October 2007

5 October 2007

pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vivo

  • Aim: The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vivo
  • The protocols for the experiment can be found here
  • The results of the test showed that pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b is working in vivo and GFPmut3b produced increases with increasing [AHL]

pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vitro

  • Aim: The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vitro, for a number of concentrations of AHL
  • The protocols for the experiment can be found here
  • The results of the test seemed very variable and didn't seemed to comply with the tests that were carried out before. There was a lot of variability between the samples and 4nM of AHL seemed to have fluorescence output greater than 50nM.
  • It was decided to carry out the experiment again. The reasons for the inaccuracies in the data could have been:
    • The reaction was not mixed properly or the right amounts were not pipetted
    • The plates had already been used and thus could have affected the reaction


Retrieved from "http://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Imperial/Wet_Lab/Lab_Notebook/2007-10-05"