BerkiGEM2007 WikiPlaying2

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 57: Line 57:
   <p> <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present4">&lt;&lt;Previous Section:  Chassis</a> | <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present5">Next Section: Genetic Self-Destruct&gt;&gt;</a></p>
   <p> <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present4">&lt;&lt;Previous Section:  Chassis</a> | <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present5">Next Section: Genetic Self-Destruct&gt;&gt;</a></p>
</div>
</div>
-
<h1 align="center">The Controller</h1>
+
<h1 align="center">Growth Control</h1>
-
<div align="justify">
+
<h2 align="center"><strong>Introduction</strong> </h2>
-
  <p>The Controller is an integrated genetic circuit, comprised of two  plasmids, that directs the copy number and transcription of the primary  devices in our system.<br />
+
<p align="justify"> To prevent chance of infection or unwanted proliferation after hemoglobin production, we have engineered a genetic self-destruct mechanism whereby when induced, the bacterial cell will express genetic material-degrading toxin which kills the cell, but leaves it physically intact. <br>
-
  </p>
+
</p>
-
</div>
+
<p align="justify">Growth control in our system is established by the incorporation of a plasmid that can be triggered to translate a toxin. The toxins are endonucleases or RNAses that destroy the genetic material within a bacteria and thus prevent the bacteria from replicating. Throughout the summer, we worked on several different constructs of an inducible toxin and screened for the ones with the best phenotype. </p>
-
<h2 align="center">Introduction</h2>
+
-
<p align="justify">The Bactoblood organism needs to exist in two different states: one  form that is genetically stable and able to grow under normal  laboratory conditions, and a second state that is highly  differentiated, unable to grow, and devoid of genetic material. To bring about the transformation to the differentiated state, we needed controller that could be easily triggered by an external cue. This  controller required a large dynamic range between the off and on  states, the ability to maintain and overexpress a large number of genes, and ideally employed a low-cost inducer. Therefore, we designed  a controller based on a two plasmid system. One plasmid stably  replicates the various biosynthetic operons of our system at single  copy in a transcriptionally-inactive state. The second plasmid houses  the genes necessary for activation of the operon plasmid. When  activated with iron, the copy number of the operon plasmid increases to high-copy and the transcription of the operons is activated.</p>
+
-
<h2 align="center">Design and construction</h2>
+
-
<p align="justify">We designed a two-plasmid architecture in which the biosynthetic operons reside on a single-copy bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC). The operons are under the transcriptional control of T7 promoters of various strengths. The BAC also contains an R6K origin of replicationIn most strains of <em>E. coli</em>, this origin is silent as it requires the expression of the <em>pir</em> gene for replication. The second plasmid in our controller is a low-copy pSC101-derived plasmid that houses the T7 RNA polymerase and <em>pir</em> genes under the control of an iron-inducible promoter.</p>
+
-
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/5/5e/Berk-DT_Figure_1.png" alt="" width="555" height="486" align="left"></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/d/d3/Berk-DT_Figure_Legend.png" alt="" name="" width="370" height="309" align="right"></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<h4>&nbsp;</h4>
+
-
<h4>&nbsp;</h4>
+
-
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/0/0a/BerkiGEM2007-yfbEcytometry.jpg" alt="" name="" width="612" height="894" align="right"></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
-
<h2 align="center">Construction of an iron-responsive PoPS-generating device</h2>
+
<h2 align="center"><strong>An Inducible Toxin</strong> </h2>
-
<p align="justify">To construct this system, first we needed a promoter that was induced by iron. Microarray studies suggested that the <em>yfbE</em> promoter of <em>E. coli</em> might function as an iron-responsive PoPS-generating device. We therefore constructed a Biobrick derived from the <em>yfbE</em> promoter and constructed an RFP reporter composite part derived from  this basic part. We examined the fluorescence of cells harboring this  part both as a function of external iron concentration and growth  phase. The <em>yfbE</em> promoter part had the ideal qualities for our  controller: it is induced 100-fold as the bacteria emerge from the  mid-log phase of growth, but only in the presence of exogenous iron.</p>
+
<p align="justify"> Using a PBAD promoter, we constructed several variations  of inducible toxins, including the colicin DNAse CeaB, endonucleases  BamHI and BglII, and RNAse barnase. Additionally, ribosome binding site  libraries were used in order to increase the likelihood of finding a construct that would exhibit no growth after being induced with arabinose, but normal growth when uninduced. </p>
 +
<p align="justify"><strong>I716408C:</strong> </p>
 +
<p align="justify"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/3/3b/Berk-Figure-Barnase.png" alt="" name="" width="298" height="156" align="left"></p>
 +
<p align="justify">We screened libraries of potential hits with a Tecan growth assay, and in the end, the constructs that showed the desirable phenotype are the  constructs shown below (I716408C and I716462). When uninduced, the  cells show growth comparable to regular DH10B cells, but when induced,  the growth plateaus as the cells lose their ability to replicate due to  RNA and DNA destruction.</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
-
<p align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/2/2a/BerkiGEM2007-Figure-Piron-vector.png" alt="" name="" width="295" height="221" align="texttop"></p>
 
-
<h4 align="center"><strong>Vectorology of the iron promoter characterization construct</strong> <strong>(Above)</strong></h4>
 
-
<h4>&nbsp;</h4>
 
-
<h4>&nbsp;</h4>
 
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
-
<p><strong>An iron-inducible promoter(To the right)</strong>: Cells were transformed with an RFP  transcriptional reporter device derived from our yfbE promoter part and  grown with or without exogenous iron to various densities and then  analyzed for fluorescence by cytometry.</p>
 
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
<p align="justify"><strong>I716462:</strong></p>
-
<h2 align="center">Construction of an iron-dependent transcription device</h2>
+
<p align="justify"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/3/38/Berk-Figure-BamHI.png" alt="" name="" width="299" height="125" align="left"></p>
-
<p align="center"><img name="" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/d/db/BerkiGEM2007-Figure-T7-vector.png" width="543" height="222" alt=""></p>
+
-
<p align="center"><strong>Vectorology of the T7 RNA Polymerase characterization construct</strong> <strong>(Above)</strong></p>
+
-
<div align="justify">
+
-
  <p>To control gene expression we needed to place the T7 RNA polymerase  under the control of the yfbE promoter on a pSC101-derived plasmid. We  therefore made a T7 RNA polymerase basic part and constructed a library  of composite parts containing the yfbE part, one of nine ribosome  binding site parts of different strengths, and the T7 RNA polymerase  gene with a GTG or an ATG start codon. We constructed these composite  parts in the pSC101 Biobrick plasmid I716101 and then examined their  activity in an engineered <em>E. coli</em> strain, GH455G, containing a  genome-integrated cassette with GFP under the control of a T7 promoter.  Of the composite parts we constructed, only the composite part with the  weakest ribosome binding site and a GTG start codon showed  iron-dependent GFP production. All composite parts with an ATG start  were too active and toxic, while the other ribosome binding sites were  either constitutively on or off.</p>
+
-
  <p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
  <p>&nbsp;  </p>
+
-
</div>
+
-
<h2 align="center">Construction of an iron-dependent copy number device</h2>
+
-
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/0/07/BerkiGEM2007-PirCytometry.jpg" alt="" name="" width="889" height="874" align="baseline"></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p><strong>Iron-inducible Copy Number (Above).</strong> Cells containing an optimized <em>yfbE-pir</em> controller, a <em>pir116</em> strain, and a non-pir strain were transformed with an inducible BAC  plasmid encoding GFP. As the copy number increases, so does the amount  of GFP produced. Only the controller cells show iron-dependent copy  number.</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p> The third component of our controller was an iron-inducible copy number amplifier system.  We therefore constructed a <em>pir</em> basic part and attempted to make composite parts with the <em>yfbE</em> promoter part. We were unable to construct Biobrick-derived cassettes  of this composition apparently due to toxicity. Instead, we constructed  a ribosome binding site-free version of the part in the pSC101-derived  plasmid. We subsequently introduced a library of ribosome binding sites  by EIPCR in which the start codon was either ATG or GTG and positions  11-13 upstream of start codon were randomized. We introduced the  library plasmids into <em>E. coli</em> cells harboring plasmid  pBACr-AraGFP which is a BAC plasmid with an R6K origin of replication  and GFP under an arabinose-inducible promoter. Due to the lack of a pir  gene in these cells, only a low level of GFP production is observed  when they are grown in arabinose media. In contrast, the production of  GFP in cells with an induced pir gene is 200-fold greater, similar to  the GFP production in the pir116 strain.</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/5/5c/BerkiGEM2007-YfbEPirScreen.jpg" alt="" name="" width="441" height="213" align="right"></p>
+
-
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2007/6/6e/BerkiGEM2007-Figure-pir-vector.png" alt="" name="" width="452" height="178" align="left"></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p><strong>Vectorology of the <em>pir</em> characterization construct</strong> <strong>(Above)</strong></p>
+
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<h2 align="center">Conclusion</h2>
+
-
<p align="justify">Our controller system allows for a dramatic induction of the operons  present on our BAC upon the introduction of free iron into the system.  It accomplishes this by utilizing both the <em>pir</em> gene to amplify  the R6K origin, as well as the T7 RNA polymerase transcription system.  This provides not only excellent dynamic range, but also the ability to  tune the relative expression levels of the operons under T7 promoter  control. These capabilities allow the Bactoblood organism to adopt its  two distinct phenotypes required for normal growth in the laboratory,  and static oxygen carrying in the bloodstream.</p>
+
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
-
<p align="center"><a href="https://2007.igem.org/Berkeley_UC">&lt;&lt;&lt; Return to UC Berkeley iGEM 2007 </a></p>
+
<h2 align="center">&nbsp;</h2>
-
<p align="center"> <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present4">&lt;&lt;Previous Section:  Chassis</a> | <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present5">Next Section: Genetic Self-Destruct&gt;&gt;</a></p>
+
<h2 align="center">&nbsp;</h2>
 +
<h2 align="center">&nbsp;</h2>
 +
<h2 align="center">Characterization of Growth Ability</h2>
 +
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
 +
<h2 align="center">Phenotype of dead cells</h2>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</body>
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 22:21, 26 October 2007


Untitled Document

<<< Return to UC Berkeley iGEM 2007

<<Previous Section: Chassis | Next Section: Genetic Self-Destruct>>

Growth Control

Introduction

To prevent chance of infection or unwanted proliferation after hemoglobin production, we have engineered a genetic self-destruct mechanism whereby when induced, the bacterial cell will express a genetic material-degrading toxin which kills the cell, but leaves it physically intact.

Growth control in our system is established by the incorporation of a plasmid that can be triggered to translate a toxin. The toxins are endonucleases or RNAses that destroy the genetic material within a bacteria and thus prevent the bacteria from replicating. Throughout the summer, we worked on several different constructs of an inducible toxin and screened for the ones with the best phenotype.

 

An Inducible Toxin

Using a PBAD promoter, we constructed several variations of inducible toxins, including the colicin DNAse CeaB, endonucleases BamHI and BglII, and RNAse barnase. Additionally, ribosome binding site libraries were used in order to increase the likelihood of finding a construct that would exhibit no growth after being induced with arabinose, but normal growth when uninduced.

I716408C:

We screened libraries of potential hits with a Tecan growth assay, and in the end, the constructs that showed the desirable phenotype are the constructs shown below (I716408C and I716462). When uninduced, the cells show growth comparable to regular DH10B cells, but when induced, the growth plateaus as the cells lose their ability to replicate due to RNA and DNA destruction.

 

 

I716462:

 

 

 

 

Characterization of Growth Ability

 

Phenotype of dead cells