July 6

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Analysis)
(→Analysis)
 
(11 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 +
* Open Loop [Ee]
 +
 +
i) Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with [aTc]=50 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL
 +
 +
ii) K12Z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=50 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL
 +
 +
iii) pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C, K12z1, pL.Y were inoculated in LB
 +
 +
iv) The contents of the flask with OD=0.217 were filtered out.
 +
 +
v) 7 dilutions were made (full range of IPTG conc) for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 50 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio.
 +
 +
 +
* Open Loop [Cc]
 +
 +
i) Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with [aTc]=5 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL
 +
 +
ii) K12z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=5 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL
 +
 +
iii) pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C, K12z1, pL.Y were inoculated in LB.
 +
 +
iv) The contents of the flask with OD=0.103 were filtered out.
 +
 +
v) 7 dilutions over the full range of IPTG were made for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 5 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio
 +
 +
 +
* Control experiments:
 +
** -ve control: K12z1
 +
**Inoculated positive control:
 +
***pL.YFP; 1xGlu M9; 500 uM IPTG
 +
***I726081; K12Z1 in aTc (50 ng/mL) medium and new 2xGlu M9 in 1:1 ratio; 500 uM IPTG
 +
***I726081; only new 1xGlu M9; 500 uM IPTG
 +
 +
 +
'''Microscopy'''
 +
 +
* The open loop samples [Ee] were imaged and FACS was done.
 +
 +
* The open loop samples [Cc] were imaged and FACS was done.
 +
 +
* The open loop samples [Dd] were imaged and FACS was done.
==Analysis==
==Analysis==
Line 11: Line 52:
Today we compiled the data collected from all our open-loop experiments performed at various concentrations of aTc (ng/ml).
Today we compiled the data collected from all our open-loop experiments performed at various concentrations of aTc (ng/ml).
The following matrix of information was obtained:
The following matrix of information was obtained:
-
{|cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="1" align="left"
+
{|cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" align="left"
|-align="center"
|-align="center"
!colspan="2" rowspan="2"|
!colspan="2" rowspan="2"|
-
CFP mean values
+
CFP mean
 +
 
 +
values
|colspan="7"|
|colspan="7"|
IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP
IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP
|-align="center"
|-align="center"
-
| 0  
+
|0  
-
| 5  
+
|5  
-
| 10
+
|10
-
| 50
+
|50
-
| 100
+
|100
-
| 500
+
|500
|1000
|1000
|-align="center"
|-align="center"
Line 86: Line 129:
|
|
|}
|}
-
{|cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="1" align="right"
+
{|cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" align="right"
|-align="center"
|-align="center"
!colspan="2" rowspan="2"|
!colspan="2" rowspan="2"|
-
YFP mean values
+
YFP mean
 +
 
 +
values
|colspan="7"|
|colspan="7"|
IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP
IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP
Line 161: Line 206:
|
|
|}
|}
-
{|align="center" width="35%"
+
{|align="center" width="37%"
|-
|-
|align="justify"|These values, obtained from the microscopy experiments, give us a clear idea of the equivalence between luxI.CFP and luxI.YFP.
|align="justify"|These values, obtained from the microscopy experiments, give us a clear idea of the equivalence between luxI.CFP and luxI.YFP.
Line 186: Line 231:
-
{|align="center" width="80%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1"
+
{|align="center" width="85%"
!align="center"|CFP Fluorescence
!align="center"|CFP Fluorescence
!align="center"|YFP Fluorescence
!align="center"|YFP Fluorescence
|-
|-
-
|align="center"|[[Image:Openloop_cfp_jul6.jpg|400px|CFP fluorescence]]
+
|[[Image:Openloop_cfp_jul6.jpg|center|thumb|350px|CFP fluorescence]]
-
|align="center"|[[Image:Openloop_yfp_jul6.jpg|400px|YFP fluorescence]]
+
|[[Image:Openloop_yfp_jul6.jpg|center|thumb|350px|YFP fluorescence]]
|-
|-
-
|align="center"|[[Image:surf_plot_cfp_jul6.jpg|400px|CFP fluorescence]]
+
|[[Image:surf_plot_cfp_jul6.jpg|center|thumb|350px|CFP fluorescence]]
-
|align="center"|[[Image:surf_plot_yfp_jul6.jpg|400px|YFP fluorescence]]
+
|[[Image:surf_plot_yfp_jul6.jpg|center|thumb|350px|YFP fluorescence]]
|-
|-
|colspan="2" align="justify"|
|colspan="2" align="justify"|
-
The increasing values along the luxI.CFP axis are the increasing concentrations of aTc whereas the increasing values along the luxR.YFP axis are the increasing concentrations of IPTG.
+
Surface plots : The increasing values along the luxI.CFP axis are the increasing concentrations of aTc whereas the increasing values along the luxR.YFP axis are the increasing concentrations of IPTG.
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 15:22, 18 August 2007

Back to Bangalore

Back to e-Notebook

Experiments

  • Open Loop [Ee]

i) Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with [aTc]=50 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL

ii) K12Z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=50 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL

iii) pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C, K12z1, pL.Y were inoculated in LB

iv) The contents of the flask with OD=0.217 were filtered out.

v) 7 dilutions were made (full range of IPTG conc) for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 50 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio.


  • Open Loop [Cc]

i) Cells were transferred to 50 mL Glu M9 in 250 mL flask with [aTc]=5 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL

ii) K12z1 was inoculated in 5 mL Glu M9 in 50 mL tube with [aTc]=5 ng/mL and inoculum=1,0.1 uL/mL

iii) pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C, K12z1, pL.Y were inoculated in LB.

iv) The contents of the flask with OD=0.103 were filtered out.

v) 7 dilutions over the full range of IPTG were made for pL.LuxR.Y.pR.C with AI from 5 ng/mL aTc and new 2xM9 in 1:1 ratio


  • Control experiments:
    • -ve control: K12z1
    • Inoculated positive control:
      • pL.YFP; 1xGlu M9; 500 uM IPTG
      • I726081; K12Z1 in aTc (50 ng/mL) medium and new 2xGlu M9 in 1:1 ratio; 500 uM IPTG
      • I726081; only new 1xGlu M9; 500 uM IPTG


Microscopy

  • The open loop samples [Ee] were imaged and FACS was done.
  • The open loop samples [Cc] were imaged and FACS was done.
  • The open loop samples [Dd] were imaged and FACS was done.

Analysis

Today we compiled the data collected from all our open-loop experiments performed at various concentrations of aTc (ng/ml). The following matrix of information was obtained:

CFP mean

values

IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP

0 5 10 50 100 500 1000

aTc (ng/ml)

or

luxI.CFP

0
1
5
10
20
50

YFP mean

values

IPTG (uM) or luxR.YFP

0 5 10 50 100 500 1000

aTc (ng/ml)

or

luxI.CFP

0
1
5
10
20
50
These values, obtained from the microscopy experiments, give us a clear idea of the equivalence between luxI.CFP and luxI.YFP.

A scatter plot with each dot representing a cell was also plotted to see the variation of fluorescence with the change in aTc and IPTG concentrations.

  • Red : 0 ng/ml aTc
  • Green : 1 ng/ml aTc
  • Blue : 5 ng/ml aTc
  • Cyan : 10 ng/ml aTc
  • Magenta : 20 ng/ml aTc
  • Yellow : 50 ng/ml aTc


CFP Fluorescence YFP Fluorescence
CFP fluorescence
YFP fluorescence
CFP fluorescence
YFP fluorescence

Surface plots : The increasing values along the luxI.CFP axis are the increasing concentrations of aTc whereas the increasing values along the luxR.YFP axis are the increasing concentrations of IPTG.

Retrieved from "http://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/July_6"