From 2007.igem.org

Revision as of 21:07, 8 August 2007 (view source) Samanthaliang (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:08, 8 August 2007 (view source) Samanthaliang (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:
	'''For tomorrow:''' <br>		'''For tomorrow:''' <br>
-	*Grow up leftys and rightys	+	*Grow up lefty and righty things
		+	*Grow up 451-454, 461-464 clones - or just do a colony PCR

---

Revision as of 21:08, 8 August 2007

My Construction Files
My Sequencing Files
My Biobricks
My -80 Stocks
First Notebook (June - July 19, 2007)

---

For tomorrow:

• Grow up lefty and righty things
• Grow up 451-454, 461-464 clones - or just do a colony PCR

Samanthaliang 17:07, 8 August 2007 (EDT)

• Miniprep Bca1114 and return one to Chris' stock box
• Miniprep 445 and 446 clones
• Analytic digest of 445 and 446 clones - bad, I just checked the sequencing for everything and it turns out that rbs.Cre.TT was never properly made, so clones 443 and 444 are actually rbs.Cre.lox clones which is not what I want, therefore I have to go back a few steps and try different cloning methods
• Subclone pbad.1090.atg.toxin variants (451-454) and pbad.1106A.atg.toxin variants (461-464)
• Transform 436, 437, Bca1114, 449 and 450 into Lefty for another approach at making rbs.Cre.TT
• Transform Bca1092 and Bca1114 into Righty

Samanthaliang 14:36, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

• Send out lots of things for sequencing (don't forget to use the reverse oligo or the ca56 oligo for several of them)
• Grow up clones of Bca1114
• Grow up 445 and 446 clones
• Maybe grow up 455 through 458 things in 96 wells to do a tecan assay with
• Definitely create an excel file with all the biobricks that you've made

Samanthaliang 21:58, 6 August 2007 (EDT)

• Retransform lox biobrick Bca1114 because it is running out
• Analytic digest of I716443 and I716444 showed that clones 2,3,4 looked good for 443 and clones 2 and 4 looked good for 444
• Subclone I716445 and I716446 from clone 2s of the parents
• Miniprepped all clones of 443, 444, 450, 449, 455, 456, 457, and 458
• Analytic digest of all

lane 1 is ladder, lanes 2-5 are 449, lanes 6-9 are 450, lanes 10-12 are 455, lanes 13-15 are 456, lanes 16-18 are 457, lanes 19-21 are 458 (All digested EcoRI/BamHI)

Samanthaliang 21:58, 5 August 2007 (EDT)

• Grow up clones of I716450 and I716449, and I716455 through I716458
• Grow up clones of I716443 and I716444 (rbs.cre.tt.lox variants)

Samanthaliang 16:03, 3 August 2007 (EDT)

• Miniprep the I716438 and I716439 clones
• Analytic digest of the I716438 and I716439 clones
• Send out for sequencing
• Subcloning rbs.Cre.TT.lox if any of the 438 and 439's look good
• Colony PCR I716450 and I716459, and I716455 through I716458
  • The colony PCR came out blank again strangely enough but I don't think this means my samples are necessarily wrong. I might just have to grow a bunch of stuff up on Sunday and do analytic digests instead.
• Analytic digest of the I716442 cassettes to check for recombination

the first lane is the ladder, the next four are I716438 clones, the next four are I716439 clones, and the next 3 are I716442 clones. Although the top band does not correlate perfectly for any of the I716438 and I716439 clones, I think they are worth sequencing and going onto the next step of subcloning just in case. I've saved clones 1 and 4 of 438 and clones 1 and 3 of 439. Also clone 3 of 442 looks good, but i'm sending both clone 2 and 3 for sequencing.

• Get someone to take plates out of incubator and put into fridge on saturday - will come in sunday to grow up stuff

Samanthaliang 18:42, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

• Build pbad.1106A.ATG - I716450
• Build pbad.1090.ATG - I716459
• Build pbad.1106A.toxin(no ATG) - I716455-I716458
  • • Note - I716457 the barnase variant already exists as part I716408C or E
• Miniprep Bca1092s (TT) for future use
• Miniprep I716442 variants
• Grow up 438 and 439 cultures (4 clones of each)

Samanthaliang 18:42, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

• Analyze sequencing
• Colony PCR of 442 clones and 439 clones
• Grow up colonies of 442 with arabinose (PCR tomorrow to see if any crazy recombination has happened)
• Grow up clones of Bca1092
• (438 didn't have any colonies) and the 439 clones failed the Colony PCR that I did
• Subclone 438 and 439 again - redigest everything - this time the terminator is right for sure, so now the other digests should be good too

Note - So I talked to Chris and asked why something like pbad.rbs.toxin wouldn't work and it's probably because the phenotype we want is too fragile and difficult to obtain in this manner and that working in the area of Cre, where people really want to figure out to make that work, is a good area to work in so hopefully I can get that cassette to be stable and work as an effective switch. However if there isn't enough time before igem, something easier could work, so right now I'm going to try to make just pbad.rbs.toxin and pbad.rbs.ATG.toxin variants to see if i can get anything that has the phenotype we want. Also it isn't a bad idea to kill the cells and look at them under a microscope to see what they look like when they're dead. If the cells lyse then we don't want it, but it'd be interesting to see how the restriction enzymes differ from the general nucleases and from the ribonucleases. I wonder if they could be potentially lysing, especially if their cell wall breaks down and they are unable to regenerate since their dna is bad.

Samanthaliang 17:51, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

• Colony PCR of 438 and 439 - I think one of the oligos I used is not quite right, maybe too dilute or something because all of my colony PCRs came back blank and I know this happened to Austin and Arthur too before and the only thing I did differently this time is that I used a different aliquot of oligo.
• Miniprep everything you grew up yesterday
• Subclone 442 out of 440 and 441
• Try redigesting Bca1092 (TT) from a different aliquot since the one I've been using yields 4 bands instead of 2 bands, although previously I've been cutting out the band that is the right size - It worked
• Subclone 438 and 439 again
• Retransform Austin's small aliquot of Bca1092
• Send out for sequencing

==Samanthaliang 19:11, 30 July 2007 (EDT)==

• Colony PCR of 438 and 439 (5 clones of each)
• Grow up ones that pass the test (none really do so I'm resubcloning, but also growing up a few)
• Colony PCR some clones if I716441 and I716440

No 438 and 439 clones look right and I think it's rather strange that there are 2 bands for most of them although it is possible to have some recombination with Cre. All clones of 441 look good and clone 3 of 440 looks good.

• Resubcloning 438 and 439.
• Pool I716430 through I716435 so you have minipreps of them

Samanthaliang 14:30, 27 July 2007 (EDT)

• Evaluate sequencing - clone 4 of 436 and clone 1 of 437 are good
• Subclone rbs.Cre.TT with 436 and 437 to make I716438 and I716439
• Subclone Cre.(barnase cassette) with 212 and 240 to make I716440
• Subclone pBad.1106A with Bca1109 and Bca1106A to make I716441

Samanthaliang 19:05, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

• Colony PCR on the cultures of 408A, 408D, 411A, 434A, and 412A with and without arabinose (maybe will see some recombination and shorter PCR products for ones with arabinose that show some phenotype)

There was no change in the size of the PCR product for any of these, which I actually started to expect because the cells that are most prominent in the saturated culture will not be the cells that have undergone recombination and died already. Although it is interesting how low the bands are for 412A, which means that some recombination must have occurred for that variant as well (T.1.BglII), showing that other structures can show a recombination phenotype as well.

• Miniprep the 436 and 437 clones and do a quick analytic gel

• Send out 436 and 437 clones out for sequencing that pass the analytic gel test - clones 2 and 4 of I716436 and clones 1 and 2 of I716437

Samanthaliang 15:15, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

• Make large scale competent cells of Righty and Lefty
• Pick colonies if I716436 (1106A.Cre) and I716437 (1109.Cre) - 4 of each
• Grow cultures of 408A, 408D, 411A, 434A, and 412A with and without arabinose to see if there is any recombination induced by arabinose of clones that have full cassettes without being induced and yet show a slight decrease in growth from the tecan assays (under 0.95 OD at the end)
• Grow up cultures of 411B since it grew on the colony PCR plate unexpectedly. It could just be contamination or an escaped mutant but hopefully it's what I want. Also, it showed no bands on the colony PCR which is weird since it ended up growing on the plate

NOTE The new thing that i want to build is:

   .pbad.rbs.atg.lox.rbs(1106A).Cre(GTG).TT.lox.barnase.

This way we can show that rbs.cre.tt is stable, then show lox.rbs.Cre.TT.lox is stable, and then focus solely on the switch by measuring the size of the cassettes and eliminate complicating studying the switch by adding toxins into the mix. After making sure the switch works by adding pbad and colony PCRing on a few clones, then add the toxin into the mix and that way we will be able to isolate the problem.

Samanthaliang 19:09, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

• Subcloned 1106A.Cre and 1090.Cre (rbs.Cre)
• PCR with ca56(in pBad promoter)/G01001 on minipreps of 416, 417, 418, 401, 411, and 412 to examine the size of the cassette - these are the ceaB variants and also a barnase and 2 bglII variants that showed some activity in the initial round of tecan screening
• Colony PCR of inactive (or rather less active) 408s - 408A, 408B, 408D, 408F
• The wells that I grew yesterday with the RFP reporter mechanism did not turn red at all so I'm going to examine that some more.
• Colony PCR of of 434 (GTG TT verision of RFP reporter) - 4 clones to look at cassette

This is annotated in my paper notebook.

• Chris saw that rbs.atg.bamH and rbs.atg.BglII wasn't lethal in Lefty, Righty, and DH10B - but will be checking if it is lethal once he adds a promoter
• Grew up cultures of Lefty and Righty

Samanthaliang 21:28, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

• Pick colonies from I716430 through I716435 in a 96 well block (swirl each colony in a well with arabinose and a well without) then check if the cultures turn red (might even be able to run a quick tecan on it to see the RFP levels)
• Analyzed sequencing results for 408C and 408E - unfortunately, these two guys are the same thing - [pbad][rbs][barnase - no ATG], which is not what I want because it is missing both Cre and the cassette. This must have occurred by some crazy recombination or something. I need to do some PCR mapping on some other clones to troubleshoot. I think hits are just falling out like crazy. Maybe it'd also be helpful to make libraries on low copy plasmids? Might be able to pick up more hits.
• Long google chat with Chris about next steps

Samanthaliang 15:17, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

Things to read about:

• Does barnase have DNase activity? Haven't really found anything saying that it has DNase activity yet, but it is a ribonuclease that destroys all the RNA and targets the ribosome, which in turn, stops DNA synthesis such that those bacteria should no longer be able to replicate and grow.
• Is there a way to do dapi (pronounced dap-E) measurements for e.coli? dapI binds to DNA, wonder if can use a cytometer or something? Do a dapi stain? YES! Can do a dapi stain in e.coli and then do measurements with a flow cytometer.
• Make sure that we're not just making a toxic protein or that Cre itself is toxic or something like that.

So I'm having a lot of trouble isolating the plasmid of 411B. The plate that I got from streaking a 96 well culture has really sickly single colonies that are super tiny. I can't get any of the colonies that I pick to grow in liquid media even when I add glucose. It also didn't grow after being streaked onto another plate. It seems like that in order to try to isolate a plasmid and sequence it, I'm going to have to take a swab of the plate in a dense area and miniprep that (put it in p1 buffer directly) then I'm going to have to sequence off of a PCR product.
Here's a picture of the gel:
Unfortunately, there were no bands on it, meaning that either that part isn't what I think it is, or else, all the cells are already dead and the primers weren't able to pick up anything big enough to see on the gel from the plasmid. I can also see kind of a smear, which could mean that I'm picking up junk, but more likely, it's just some discoloration from the dye or something.

• Miniprep 408C, 408E, and 411B (by swabbing it)
• run PCR on 411B (ca998/G01001) and gel purify it
• Sequence 408C, 408E
• Make -80s of 408C and 408E
• Look at spotted plates - the spots actually look like they're less dense for the ones that showed a plateauing growth rate. I don't think it's obvious enough to be convincing of anything though. I guess if any cell is alive though, it would grow in the spot.