Melbourne/Lab Notebook gv 2

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 9: Line 9:
==Site dirrected Mutagenesis Round #1 ==
==Site dirrected Mutagenesis Round #1 ==
*Applied the [[Melbourne/Site directed mutagenesis|stratagene Site directed mutagenesis protocol]]to the following DNA and primer pairs, which when plated out on LB AMP plates producing the numbers of colonies shown. Several of these were picked and tubes marked with a character suffix as shown in table.
*Applied the [[Melbourne/Site directed mutagenesis|stratagene Site directed mutagenesis protocol]]to the following DNA and primer pairs, which when plated out on LB AMP plates producing the numbers of colonies shown. Several of these were picked and tubes marked with a character suffix as shown in table.
 +
{| border="1"
{| border="1"
|+ Site dirrected Mutagenesis round #1
|+ Site dirrected Mutagenesis round #1
Line 48: Line 49:
* [[Melb:Miniprep protocol|Minipreped remaining culture (4mL) giving 100uL.]]   
* [[Melb:Miniprep protocol|Minipreped remaining culture (4mL) giving 100uL.]]   
* [[Melbourne/equipement/Measure DNA|Measure DNA concentrations]] using 2uL of miniprep(100uL) diluted in 98uL of TE.
* [[Melbourne/equipement/Measure DNA|Measure DNA concentrations]] using 2uL of miniprep(100uL) diluted in 98uL of TE.
 +
{|| border="1"
{|| border="1"
|+ DNA concentrations in ng/uL
|+ DNA concentrations in ng/uL
Line 73: Line 75:
*Digest Pattern
*Digest Pattern
*Expected effects
*Expected effects
 +
{| border="1"
{| border="1"
|+ PstI digest
|+ PstI digest
Line 78: Line 81:
!History!!Mutation tube !!FRAGMENTS
!History!!Mutation tube !!FRAGMENTS
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1!!pNL29T1||         5983|| 2516|| 378|| 105
+
!pNL29T1!!pNL29T1         ||  || 5983|| 2516|| 378|| 105
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->!!3!!6088 || 2516 || 378!! <-
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->!!3||  !!6088 || 2516 || 378!! <-
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->!!4 || 5983|| 2516!!483!! <-  
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->!!4 || ||5983|| 2516!!483!! <-  
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->!!5|| 5983|| 2516!!483!! <-  
+
!pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->!!5||  ||5983|| 2516!!483!! <-  
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->!!6|| 5983|| 2516|| 378|| 105
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->!!6||  ||5983|| 2516|| 378|| 105
|-
|-
-
!pNL26P3!!pNL26P3||         3928 || 3137 ||  2516 || 378 || 220 || 105 || 33
+
!pNL26P3!!pNL26P3||           ||3928 || 3137 ||  2516 || 378 || 220 || 105 || 33
|-
|-
-
!p26P3-(GvpQ-g183a)->!!10|| 3928 !! 3170 || 2516 || 378 || 220 || 105 !! <-
+
!p26P3-(GvpQ-g183a)->!!10||  ||3928 !! 3170 || 2516 || 378 || 220 || 105 !! <-
|-
|-
-
!p26P3-(GvpP-g441a)->!!11!! 4148 || 3137 || 2516 || 378 !! <-  || 105 || 33
+
!p26P3-(GvpP-g441a)->!!11!!   ||4148 || 3137 || 2516 || 378 !! <-  || 105 || 33
|}
|}
 +
{| border="1"
{| border="1"
|+ EcoRI and BamHI digest
|+ EcoRI and BamHI digest
|-
|-
-
!History!!Mutation tube\Fragments: !! A !! B !!C
+
!History!!Mutation tube!!Fragments:
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1!!pNL29T1          || 6124|| 2112|| 747
+
!pNL29T1!!pNL29T1          || || 6124|| 2112|| 747
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->!!3 || 6124|| 2112|| 747
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->!!3 || || 6124|| 2112|| 747
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->!!4 || 6124|| 2112|| 747
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->!!4 || || 6124|| 2112|| 747
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->!!5 || 6124|| 2112|| 747
+
!pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->!!5 || || 6124|| 2112|| 747
|-
|-
-
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->!!6|| 6871|2112|| -
+
!pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->!!6 || !! 6871|| 2112!! <-
|}
|}
*Results of PstI diagnostics:   
*Results of PstI diagnostics:   

Revision as of 01:41, 5 October 2007

Prepared for site dirrected mutagenesis

  • resuspended primers supplied by geneworks to produce stock solution at 125ng/uL using filtered,autoclaved,milliQ water.
  • Produced working solutions at 125ng/2uL by diluting 10uL of stock with 190uL of filtered,autoclaved,milliQ water.
  • Produced NZY broth 100mL autoclaved
  • Produced 1mL of 10mM IPTG filter sterilised
  • Produced 1mL of 2% XGAL in DMF(Dimethylformamide) filter sterilized


Site dirrected Mutagenesis Round #1

  • Applied the stratagene Site directed mutagenesis protocolto the following DNA and primer pairs, which when plated out on LB AMP plates producing the numbers of colonies shown. Several of these were picked and tubes marked with a character suffix as shown in table.
Site dirrected Mutagenesis round #1
Mutation Number Template DNA (10ng) Sence Primer Antisence Primer #Colonies Picks named
1 pWhitescript control #1 control #2 Blue and White on XGAL&IPTG plates
2 pNL29T1 GvpL-g213a GvpL-g213a-R None
3 pNL29T1 GvpL-g318a GvpL-g318a-R 3 3A,3B,3C
4 pNL29T1 JMY-g318a JMY-g318a-R 26 4A,4B,4C
5 pNL29T1 Comp-g318a Comp-g318a-R 60 5A,5B,5C
6 pNL29T1 GvpL-g351a GvpL-g351a-R 1 6A
7 pNL29T1 GvpL-g696a GvpL-g696a-R None
8 pNL29T1 GvpA-t57c GvpA-t57c-R None
9 pNL29T1 GvpQ-g150a GvpL-Q-g150a None
10 pNL29T1 GvpQ-g183a GvpQ-g183aa-R 6 10A,10B,10C,10D,10E
11 pNL29T1 GvpP-g441a GvpP-g441a-R 200 11A,11B,11C,11D
12 PUC18 N/A N/A 30 Blue on Xgal&IPTG Plates
13 N/A N/A N/A None
14 pNL29T1 GvpL-g213a GvpL-g213a-R None
15 IPTG & Xgal N/A N/A None
DNA concentrations in ng/uL
HistoryMutation tube\colony: A B C D E
pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->3 141 112
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->4 108 218
pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->5 141 119
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->6 212
pNL26P3-(GvpQ-g183a)->10 305 253 258 392 272
pNL26P3-(GvpP-g441a)->11 221 190 259204
  • Diagnostic digests were performed using
    • A) 21.5uL of each in Buffer3 with 1uL PstI (20U) at 37degC for 2h30min. (25uL reaction)
    • B) 21.5uL of each p29T1 based colony in Buffer2 with 1uL EcoRI (20U) and 1uL BamHI (20U) at 37degC for 2h30min. (26uL reaction)
    • C) 21.5uL of each pNL26P3 based colony and in Buffer2 with 1uL EcoRI (20U) at 37degC for 2h30min. (25uL reaction)
  • Prepared two 20 lane 100mL agarose gel
  • Loaded 20uL of digest
  • Digest Pattern
  • Expected effects
PstI digest
HistoryMutation tube FRAGMENTS
pNL29T1pNL29T1 5983 2516 378 105
pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->3 6088 2516 378 <-
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->4 5983 2516483 <-
pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->5 5983 2516483 <-
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->6 5983 2516 378 105
pNL26P3pNL26P3 3928 3137 2516 378 220 105 33
p26P3-(GvpQ-g183a)->10 3928 3170 2516 378 220 105 <-
p26P3-(GvpP-g441a)->11 4148 3137 2516 378 <- 105 33
EcoRI and BamHI digest
HistoryMutation tubeFragments:
pNL29T1pNL29T1 6124 2112 747
pNL29T1-(GvpP-g441a)->3 6124 2112 747
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g318a)->4 6124 2112 747
pNL29T1-(Comp-g318a)->5 6124 2112 747
pNL29T1-(GvpL-g351a)->6 6871 2112 <-
  • Results of PstI diagnostics:
    • pNL29 control was barely visable.
    • Bands less than 300bp were not visable
    • Colonies 5A,5B,5C,and 3C all showed bands at 483bp and not at 378bp as required although 5B and 3C appear slightly larger than the other two.
    • Colony 6A shows no band at 747bp and a band at 6871bp as required.
    • Colonies 4A,and 4B contain a band at 378bp indicating failure of mutagenesis.
    • The following colonies show additional bands of unknown origin: 3B and 4C (700bp) , 3A (8500bp) of unknown origin.
    • See Gel
    • Conclude that 5A and 6A are suitable templates for the second round of mutagenesis.
  • Results of EcoRI diagnostics:
    • pNL26 control barely visable.
    • Colonies 11A,B,C,D and 10A,B,C,D,E all show required pattern but the 33bp band is unlikely to be visible making the 10A..E test inconclusive, and the 220bp band in 11A..D is only barely visible in 11A..E making its diagnosis also risky.
    • See Gel
    • Conclude that 10B and 11A may be suitable templates for the second round of mutagenesis.
    • Conclude that Primers generated by the stratagene program Comp-g318a outperformed (60 colonies of which 2/3 provided correct product ) both offset primers JMY-g318a (26 colonies of which 2/3 gave template DNA)primers and hand designed primers Gvp-g318a (3 colonies of which when using the stratagene PCR protocol.
Sucess of primers gnerated different ways:
Primers nameDesign protocol no colonies #correctly mutated #unknown # template
(Comp-g318a) Statagene 60 2 1 -
(JMY-g318a) Offset 26 - 1 2
(GvpL-g318a) Hand design 3 - 3 -
  • It was however also noted that the success of the PCR with the hand generated primers was negatively correlated with the melting temperature of the primers.
  • It was therefore decided to increase the initial melting time from 1 to 2 minutes and increase subsequent melting times from 50 seconds to 1 minute in the next round of mutagenesis.