Imperial/Wet Lab/Results/CBD2.3
From 2007.igem.org
m (→Results) |
m (→Results) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Results == | == Results == | ||
{|align="center" | {|align="center" | ||
- | | width="600px"|<br> | + | | width="600px"|<br>[[Image:IC 2007 CBD steps.PNG| The graph shows how a step increase and decrease in temperature affects the fluorescence produced by the pTet-GFPmut3b construct|800px|Fig 1.1:Average fluorescence over time for two samples at constant temperatures of 4°C and 20°C and two with a temperature step ( 4-20°C and 20-4°C)]] |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:15, 26 October 2007
In vitro Testing of pTet-GFPmut3b Construct for constant and step temperatures
Aims
To determine how the system ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 pTet-GFPmut3b]) responds to a step increase or a step decrease in temperature, compared to a constant temperture, in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Link to the Protocols page
Results
Controls:
- Negative control - empty vector (pTet promoter) with the cell extract
Constants:
- Temperature - 4°C and 20°C
- Total Volume - 60µl
Raw Data:
Discussion
The 'step' samples were moved from their original temperature to the other 180mins after the start of the experiment. As it can be seen from the results above, the temperature step has a very rapid affect on the fluorescence of the DNA construct.
Both samples at 4°C have similar fluorescence until 180mins. After the sample is moved to 20°C, the fluorescnce produced increases to a very high value.
Moving the sample at 20°C to 4° seems to have increased the fluorescence by a little amount. This is not what was expected as the pTet-GFPmut3b construct showed linear relationship with temperature earlier.
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the results that the pTet-GFPmut3b construct is sensitive to a step increase and step decrease in the temperature.