June 20

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Analysis)
(→Analysis)
Line 25: Line 25:
'''Mean and Standard Error Plots at all induction levels'''  
'''Mean and Standard Error Plots at all induction levels'''  
-
<gallery>
 
-
Image:CFPlin.jpg|A linear plot of mean CFP Fluorescence values at all aTc concentrations.The low values of the red points show that aTc causes no CFP fluorescence in the absence of pT.luxI.C as is in K12Z1. Also, the blue and green points almost form a sigmoid, except for the value at 100 aTc.
 
-
Image:YFPlin.jpg
 
-
Image:RFPlin.jpg
 
 +
{|style="bordercolor=brown" border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2"
 +
|-
 +
|[[Image:CFPlin.jpg|thumb|200px|CFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)]]
-
Image:CFPlog.jpg
+
The low values of the red points show that aTc causes no CFP fluorescence in the absence of pT.luxI.C as is in K12Z1. Also, the blue and green points almost form a sigmoid, except for the value at 100 aTc(???).
-
Image:YFPlog.jpg
+
|[[Image:YFPlin.jpg|thumb|200px|YFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)]]
-
Image:RFPlog.jpg
+
 
-
</gallery>
+
Look at the scale on the Y-axis. The YFP Fluorescence is far lower(almost negligible) than the CFP Fluorescence.
 +
|[[Image:RFPlin.jpg|thumb|200px|RFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)]]
 +
 
 +
Even here the RFP Fluorescence values are too low and are safely neglected.
 +
|-
 +
|[[Image:CFPlog.jpg|thumb|200px|CFP v/s aTc concentration (log)]]
 +
 
 +
Somewhat sigmoidal curve obtained (but not convinced)!
 +
|[[Image:YFPlog.jpg|thumb|200px|YFP v/s aTc concentration (log)]]
 +
 
 +
The red and green points are close to each other. This shows that the YFP expression in pT.luxI.C is almost the same as is in K12Z1. Again safely neglected!!!
 +
|[[Image:RFPlog.jpg|thumb|200px|RFP v/s aTc concentration (log)]]
 +
 
 +
Same as in YFP log. Even here the red and green points are close to each other. Shows that the RFP expression in pT.luxI.C is almost the same as is in K12Z1. Again safely neglected!!!
 +
|}

Revision as of 16:57, 25 June 2007

Experiments

Microscopy:

  • pT luxI Cfp imaging done at various induction levels but OD was too high
  • K12Z1 imaging done at various induction levels
  • 1st Open loop trial Experiment DONE (Auto fluorescence, pT.luxI.C (at AI OD 2 and 0.2))

FACS:

  • Auto fluorescence at inductions [0,1,10,25,50,100] done in triplets
  • pT.luxI.C fluorescence at inductions [0,1,10,25,50,100] done in triplets
  • Fluorescence due to M9 solution (Control)

Analysis

Microscopy:

pT LuxI.C: Subtract K12Z1 and plot CFP,YFP,RFP vs aTC concn

Red : K12Z1 Fluorescence values at different aTc induction levels

Green : pT.luxI.C Fluorescence values at different aTc induction levels

Blue : pT.luxI.C - K12Z1 Fluorescence values at different aTc induction levels

Linear and log space

Mean and Standard Error Plots at all induction levels

CFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)

The low values of the red points show that aTc causes no CFP fluorescence in the absence of pT.luxI.C as is in K12Z1. Also, the blue and green points almost form a sigmoid, except for the value at 100 aTc(???).

YFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)

Look at the scale on the Y-axis. The YFP Fluorescence is far lower(almost negligible) than the CFP Fluorescence.

RFP v/s aTc concentration (linear)

Even here the RFP Fluorescence values are too low and are safely neglected.

CFP v/s aTc concentration (log)

Somewhat sigmoidal curve obtained (but not convinced)!

YFP v/s aTc concentration (log)

The red and green points are close to each other. This shows that the YFP expression in pT.luxI.C is almost the same as is in K12Z1. Again safely neglected!!!

RFP v/s aTc concentration (log)

Same as in YFP log. Even here the red and green points are close to each other. Shows that the RFP expression in pT.luxI.C is almost the same as is in K12Z1. Again safely neglected!!!

Retrieved from "http://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/June_20"