From 2007.igem.org

This year our new team has been developing the project established last year which you can see on the McGill 2006 wiki. We have made many new discoveries and have run into some problems hindering our progress along the way; nevertheless, we were able to make some new developments as outlined below:

1. Reproduction of Last Year's System with a now known caveat.
The primary oscillating system, the I15004 with the J40001 as outlined in the previous pages was produced last year and viewed using a microscope for several hours to analyze the oscillatory period and confirm the presence of these oscillations. This year, we took this a step further. Using a spectrophotometer, we were able to achieve more precise quantitative results for the oscillating network and we were also able to test many samples at a time with variations in the testing conditions: variable concentrations of cells, variable concentrations of IPTG, Dox (tetracycline analog), and AHL (synthetic auto-inducer). From these experiments, we were able to come up with some interesting results.

1. The more concentrated the cells, the worse the apparent oscillations.
   
2. The presence of Dox seemed to stabilize the oscillations.
   
3. The greater the amount of AHL, the worse the apparent oscillations as predicted with the simulations.
   
4. Using an optical density assay, it was found that the cells were in fact dying (or clumping) thus lowering the optical density through the testing period.
   
5. Oscillations occurs also without the presence of the I15004 brick (thus, the J40001 brick oscillates on its own. The reason for this is attributed to the expression of the endogenous lac in the BL21 cells, the expression cells used in this experiment. So, to remedy this, we replaced the BL21 cells with MC cells, the lac-, tet- cells used by Elowitz himself when doing these experiments. Results: no oscillations which led us to the nest point, the malfunctioning I15004 brick needs to be replaced.

2. Production of a new I15004 brick to compensate for the mal-functioning biobrick.
In light of the terrible bands following a restriction digest and the lack of oscillations in the MC cells, we constructed and new sequence of DNA containing the proper components of the I15004 needed for the oscillating network and added of few of our own.

This sequence contains the following:

1. pLac, ribosome binding site, LuxI These three components are present from the I15004 and are required for the oscillating network.
2. RFP THe RFP is an addition of our own. This allows us to track the expression of both the oscillating I15004 brick and the J40001 brick thus ascerning oscillations in more than one way (note, a third method of reporting is included with the repressillator).
3. pConstitutive, ribosome binding site, LuxR Here, the constitutive promoter was another one of our designs. When coupled with the repressilator, this eliminates one of the crossing links that would make the system more connected and create more variables. By eliminating the tetracycline promotor, our system is much cleaner.
   

As ideal and wonderful as this system sounds, we were unable to put it into action. We ordered the sequence from GenArt in early August and alas, it has still not arrived in time for the Jamboree due to ligation problems.

3. Coupling of the Oscillator with the Repressilator.
As shown in 2006, one of the major prospects of this year was to couple the oscillator with Elozitz's repressilator: a triple repressing system which will change the spiking oscillations from the dual oscillator to robust sinosodial curves. Modelling using deterministic rate equations preidicted beautiful curves that we have attempted to reproduce in the lab. Again, we ran into some problems. The restriction digest revealed anomolous gel results and when attempting to view the reporting gene in the repressilator, we were unable to see the fluorescence, conclusion, the I5610 is not what is appears to be. So, onto our next section of being, creating a new represillator.

4. Synthesis of a new Represillator from different components parts, again, to compensate for the mal-function biobrick.
In the registry, there are two other alternative biobricks that contain fragments of the repressilator. One of them, I5611 contains all the components of the represillator without the degradation tag for the flourescent reporter. So what can we do? We can place a new degradation tag on the I5611 to make a functional Elowitz repressilator. These is feasible as another biobrick, E0434, containing the same YFP reporter with a functional degradation tag. Using BsrG1 and SpeI to cleave the YFP is an identical point in both the I5611 and the E0434, we plan to preform a ligation of these two pieces to develop the functional unit. Unfortunately, though in progress, this could not be completed for the Jamboree due to ligation difficulty. Due to the low copy number of the plasmids to be amplified and the fidelity of the ligation proceedure, time did not permit the completion of this vital component of our project thus there are no represillator oscillations to report.

4. Synthesis and completion of a new biobrick, an addition to the J40001 made last years with the addition of Aiia.