Davidson Missouri W/Gene splitting

From 2007.igem.org

< Davidson Missouri W
Revision as of 18:38, 23 October 2007 by Anmartens (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Home | Background Information | Current Project: Solving the Hamiltonian Path Problem in vivo | Mathematical Modeling | Gene Splitting | Results | Traveling Salesperson Problem | Software | Resources and Citations

What is Gene Splitting?

"Gene splitting" refers to the insertion of a hixC site within the coding region of a gene. Although this allows us to create edges for the simulation of a graph, it will change the protein sequence, potentially interfering with proper functionality. We successfully inserted hixC in two different reporter genes, GFP and RFP. Cells transformed with plasmids containing these "split" genes still fluoresce the appropriate color.

A promoter upstream of a reporter gene will produce the expected phenotype.
The insertion of a hixC site, or 13 extra amino acids, might prevent the expected phenotype.

To facilitate the splitting process we developed software to help us. Our [http://gcat.davidson.edu/iGEM07/genesplitter.html online] gene splitting web tool (click here for a tutorial) helps us choose PCR primers that will amplify the appropriate segments of a gene of interest.

The Genes

Gene Description Protein 3D Structure and hixC Insertion Point
GFP - Green Fluorescent Protein In the spring of 2007, Karen Acker pioneered the gene-splitting process by splitting GFP. According to previous research, it had been shown that it was possible to insert extra amino acids within a particular region of the protein without disrupting green fluorescence. Acker successfully inserted a hixC site at the same location, between amino acids 157 and 158. Gfp insertion.png
DsRed - Red Fluorescent Protein After Acker demonstrated that GFP fluoresces despite a hixC insertion, we tested the same process on RFP, [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_E1010 RFP] (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=86600 Discosoma sp.]). Although its DNA sequence is markedly different from GFP's, it has some amino acid similarity and a remarkable structural similarity. Both proteins have a Beta-barrel structure which surrounds an internal chromophore.

Fortunately, the similarity between GFP and RFP allowed us to make an educated guess for where to insert. RFP's amino acid position 154 is homologous to GFP's amino acid position 157, which is where GFP was split. This was therefore our best guess for where to insert the hixC site.

RFP was also successfully split. However, the color is much weaker and takes a day at room temperature to become visible by eye.

Rfp insertion.png

A Closer Look

Here is a more detailed view of splitting GFP. The image on the left, with the protein structure highlighted in green, shows the normal, wild-type structure of the protein. The image on the right highlights the two parts of the protein on either side of the hixC insertion, shown in pink. The additional 13 amino acids are not shown, but they would extend from one pink amino acid into the next.

From these 3-dimensional PDB images it becomes apparent that the insertion likely sticks into open space away from the rest of the protein. This increases the likelihood that the addition does not interfere with the beta barrel structure or with the chromophore.

As a consequence of RFP's similar 3-dimensional structure it is assumed the hixC insertion acts in a similar fashion.

The unmodified structure of GFP.
The sections before and after the hixC insertion are highlighted in blue and yellow. The amino acids at the insertion point are shown in pink.



< Previous Section | Next Section>