Talk:Jamboree/Compete
From 2007.igem.org
< Talk:Jamboree(Difference between revisions)
m (→Project Documentation on the iGEM Wiki) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
== Project Documentation on the iGEM Wiki == | == Project Documentation on the iGEM Wiki == | ||
- | + | === Judging criteria === | |
- | * | + | * Team Project well documented on the iGEM wiki - y/n |
+ | * Team parts in the Registry and documented - y/n | ||
+ | * Team parts received at Registry - y/n | ||
+ | |||
+ | On a scale from 1-5 (comments field for each): | ||
+ | * Idea | ||
+ | * Design | ||
+ | * Modeling | ||
+ | * Construction | ||
+ | * Testing | ||
+ | * Documentation/wiki | ||
+ | * Attribution | ||
+ | * References | ||
+ | * Useful Parts | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 3 teams - 15min / team (all in the same track, but not the evaluator's) | ||
+ | * Not interested in evaluating option | ||
+ | |||
* Good examples | * Good examples | ||
* Help porting your external wiki content into the iGEM 2007 wiki | * Help porting your external wiki content into the iGEM 2007 wiki | ||
- | |||
== Part Documentation on the Registry == | == Part Documentation on the Registry == | ||
- | |||
* They must be promoted (favorited/selected) from the team's sandbox | * They must be promoted (favorited/selected) from the team's sandbox | ||
* Basic criteria used by the Judging Committee | * Basic criteria used by the Judging Committee | ||
* Complete criteria required for an '''accepted rating''' | * Complete criteria required for an '''accepted rating''' | ||
* Good examples / bad examples | * Good examples / bad examples | ||
- | + | ||
== Part Submission to the Registry == | == Part Submission to the Registry == | ||
'''Description''': Ship your parts to the Registry. Detailed instructions are available at [Jamboree/DNA Submission]. | '''Description''': Ship your parts to the Registry. Detailed instructions are available at [Jamboree/DNA Submission]. | ||
- | + | ||
== Poster == | == Poster == | ||
- | |||
* Judging criteria | * Judging criteria | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
== Presentation (20-min) == | == Presentation (20-min) == | ||
- | |||
* Judging criteria | * Judging criteria | ||
* Good Examples | * Good Examples | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
== Online Judging Process == | == Online Judging Process == | ||
More information about how the community scoring process will work will be available in the coming months. | More information about how the community scoring process will work will be available in the coming months. | ||
+ | |||
== Tracks == | == Tracks == | ||
Line 46: | Line 54: | ||
* Foundational Synthetic Biology (including basic part & device development, characterization techniques, etc.) | * Foundational Synthetic Biology (including basic part & device development, characterization techniques, etc.) | ||
* Other | * Other | ||
+ | |||
== Judging Committee == | == Judging Committee == |
Latest revision as of 17:56, 22 October 2007
Contents |
Project Documentation on the iGEM Wiki
Judging criteria
- Team Project well documented on the iGEM wiki - y/n
- Team parts in the Registry and documented - y/n
- Team parts received at Registry - y/n
On a scale from 1-5 (comments field for each):
- Idea
- Design
- Modeling
- Construction
- Testing
- Documentation/wiki
- Attribution
- References
- Useful Parts
- 3 teams - 15min / team (all in the same track, but not the evaluator's)
- Not interested in evaluating option
- Good examples
- Help porting your external wiki content into the iGEM 2007 wiki
Part Documentation on the Registry
- They must be promoted (favorited/selected) from the team's sandbox
- Basic criteria used by the Judging Committee
- Complete criteria required for an accepted rating
- Good examples / bad examples
Part Submission to the Registry
Description: Ship your parts to the Registry. Detailed instructions are available at [Jamboree/DNA Submission].
Poster
- Judging criteria
Presentation (20-min)
- Judging criteria
- Good Examples
Online Judging Process
More information about how the community scoring process will work will be available in the coming months.
Tracks
Teams may be separated into one of several broad categories based on the focus of their project, called tracks, to facilitate the judging process and organization of the Jamboree. The Judging committee is still deciding on the particular tracks, which will organize projects into something similar to the following categories:
- Energy & Environmental applications
- Health & Medicine applications
- Foundational Synthetic Biology (including basic part & device development, characterization techniques, etc.)
- Other
Judging Committee
- Overview
- How to Become a Judge
- Bio + Pics of Judges