Tokyo/Expression level check
From 2007.igem.org
(→Result & Conclusion:) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
==Expression level check on two different ''promoters + plasmid sets'' == | ==Expression level check on two different ''promoters + plasmid sets'' == | ||
- | ==== | + | ==== Objective: ==== |
To measure and compare the activities of two different ''promoters + plasmid sets'' by fluorescence of GFP downstream of each promoter. | To measure and compare the activities of two different ''promoters + plasmid sets'' by fluorescence of GFP downstream of each promoter. | ||
Lambda cI-regulated promoter and the lux lac hybrid promoter were tested. | Lambda cI-regulated promoter and the lux lac hybrid promoter were tested. |
Revision as of 18:56, 26 October 2007
Works top 0.Hybrid promoter 1.Formulation 2.Assay1 3.Simulation 4.Assay2 5.Future works
Activation check by cell-produced AHL Expression level check on promoters + plasmid sets of A and B sides
Expression level check on two different promoters + plasmid sets
Objective:
To measure and compare the activities of two different promoters + plasmid sets by fluorescence of GFP downstream of each promoter. Lambda cI-regulated promoter and the lux lac hybrid promoter were tested.
Samples:
・A4Δp pc1-GFP
・A4 hybrid GFP PBR322TetR (+)AHL
・A4 hybrid GFP PBR322TetR (-)AHL
*The promoter pcI sequence was designed to contain OR1, -35, and -10 regions, but not R2 or OR3.
Procedure:
AHL assay Standard protocol
Wash
OD and fluorescence were measured 0, 3, and 6 hours after the fresh culture incubation started.
Result & Conclusion:
Two plasmid sets, A4Δp+pc1-GFP and A4 hybrid+GFP PBR322TetR (+)AHL, shows almost the same fluorescence of GFP, indicating that expression levels of both sets are almost the same though the latter is a bit smaller.
Based on the results, the ranges of bistability and those of mono-stability are calculated as shown in Fig. 1.
.