Paris/ConstructionProcess
From 2007.igem.org
David.bikard (Talk | contribs) |
Eismoustique (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Paris_menu}} | {{Template:Paris_menu}} | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | == Overview == | ||
| + | Through classical molecular biology techniques, we aimed to construct the following genomically inserted cassette | ||
| - | + | [[Image:Paris_FinalConstruct2.JPG|550px]] | |
| - | + | This full construct has yet to be assembled in the genome. | |
| - | + | As can be seen on this schematic representation of the SMB genomic backbone cassette, at basal genomic state (in Germ line cells): | |
| - | + | *pTet promoter drives the expression of gfp. | |
| + | *The expression of ftsK is controlled by its natural promoter. | ||
| + | *ftsK is isolated from pTet promoter by the intercalation of Terminator (B0015 terminator). | ||
| + | *dapA gene is in a dormant state since it lacks a promoter to drive its transcription. | ||
| - | |||
| - | + | Upon G to S differentiation, the following genomic reassembly should take place: | |
| + | constructed. These are termed the “'''upstream construct'''” & the “'''downstream construct'''”: | ||
| - | + | [[Image:Paris_Recombination scheme.JPG|600px]] | |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | + | Cre mediated lox recombination should lead to: | |
| - | + | ||
| + | *excision of ftsK gene from the genome on a circular unreplicative DNA molecule. We ignore how much time such a DNA is stable in a cell. | ||
| + | *placing dapA gene under the control of pTet promoter. This should lead to dapA expression, & hopefully to DAP synthesis. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | + | ---- | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | In order to construct this genomic cassette, we have considered two technical solutions: | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | 1) Either the full construct is cloned on a plasmid and inserted in the genome of a ''dapA-'', ''ftsK-''(ts) E.coli strain. This was the initial strategy we adopted then subsequently abandoned. cloning ftsZ gene, which we had initially selected as the essential gene in our construct, has proven to be quite problematic. | |
| - | + | 2) Or the cassette is sequentially assembled, in the genome, around the essential gene selected (ftsK in our case). | |
| - | + | ||
| + | The second strategy does not require cloning ftsK gene & does not require using an ''ftsK'' mutant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We have chosen the second strategy mentioned above to generate the SMB genomic backbone construct. The different steps of this process are as follow: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2 plasmid born constructs were generated. These are termed the “upstream construct” & the “downstream construct”: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Upstream construct: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Upstream construct:''' | ||
| + | [[Image:Paris_UpstreamConstruct.JPG|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Upstream construct|SEE HERE]] how the upstream construct sequentially assembled on a plasmid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Downstream construct:''' | ||
| + | [[Image:Paris_DownstreamConstruct.JPG|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Downstream construct|SEE HERE]] how the downstream construct was sequentially assembled | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | As their names indicate, these constructs are to be inserted upstream and downstream of ftsK gene in the genome of a ''dapA''- strain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We chose to insert these constructs using a strategy described by Datsenko KA. & Wanner BL. (PNAS 2000) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | We have yet to insert the constructs in the genome. This will be done sequentially: | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a first step the downstream construct is amplified using oligonucteotides baring sequences homologous to those downstream of ftsK. The PCR product is used to transform a dapA- E.coli strain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Paris_Downstream Insertion.JPG|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The resistance cassette frt-CmR-frt carried by the downstream construct allows screening for the event of genomic insertion of the construct. CmR gene confers resistance to the antibiotic chloramphenicol. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Subsequently, the Chloramphenicol resistance gene is eliminated by FRT recombination. This reaction is to be catalysed by the site specific recombinase: Flp. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Paris_Flp.JPG|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The upstream construct can then be inserted based on the same strategy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Paris_UpstreamInsertion.JPG|700px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:08, 27 October 2007
Overview
Through classical molecular biology techniques, we aimed to construct the following genomically inserted cassette
This full construct has yet to be assembled in the genome.
As can be seen on this schematic representation of the SMB genomic backbone cassette, at basal genomic state (in Germ line cells):
- pTet promoter drives the expression of gfp.
- The expression of ftsK is controlled by its natural promoter.
- ftsK is isolated from pTet promoter by the intercalation of Terminator (B0015 terminator).
- dapA gene is in a dormant state since it lacks a promoter to drive its transcription.
Upon G to S differentiation, the following genomic reassembly should take place:
constructed. These are termed the “upstream construct” & the “downstream construct”:
Cre mediated lox recombination should lead to:
- excision of ftsK gene from the genome on a circular unreplicative DNA molecule. We ignore how much time such a DNA is stable in a cell.
- placing dapA gene under the control of pTet promoter. This should lead to dapA expression, & hopefully to DAP synthesis.
In order to construct this genomic cassette, we have considered two technical solutions:
1) Either the full construct is cloned on a plasmid and inserted in the genome of a dapA-, ftsK-(ts) E.coli strain. This was the initial strategy we adopted then subsequently abandoned. cloning ftsZ gene, which we had initially selected as the essential gene in our construct, has proven to be quite problematic.
2) Or the cassette is sequentially assembled, in the genome, around the essential gene selected (ftsK in our case).
The second strategy does not require cloning ftsK gene & does not require using an ftsK mutant.
We have chosen the second strategy mentioned above to generate the SMB genomic backbone construct. The different steps of this process are as follow:
2 plasmid born constructs were generated. These are termed the “upstream construct” & the “downstream construct”:
Upstream construct:
Upstream construct:
SEE HERE how the upstream construct sequentially assembled on a plasmid.
Downstream construct:
SEE HERE how the downstream construct was sequentially assembled
As their names indicate, these constructs are to be inserted upstream and downstream of ftsK gene in the genome of a dapA- strain.
We chose to insert these constructs using a strategy described by Datsenko KA. & Wanner BL. (PNAS 2000)
We have yet to insert the constructs in the genome. This will be done sequentially:
In a first step the downstream construct is amplified using oligonucteotides baring sequences homologous to those downstream of ftsK. The PCR product is used to transform a dapA- E.coli strain.
The resistance cassette frt-CmR-frt carried by the downstream construct allows screening for the event of genomic insertion of the construct. CmR gene confers resistance to the antibiotic chloramphenicol.
Subsequently, the Chloramphenicol resistance gene is eliminated by FRT recombination. This reaction is to be catalysed by the site specific recombinase: Flp.
The upstream construct can then be inserted based on the same strategy.
