Calgary/evoGEM results
From 2007.igem.org
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
Currently our only means of assessing these accomplishments is by qualitatively comparing the results of our 3D graphical simulation to the wetlab results. While this is not ideal it represents an excellent starting point. | Currently our only means of assessing these accomplishments is by qualitatively comparing the results of our 3D graphical simulation to the wetlab results. While this is not ideal it represents an excellent starting point. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| - | <table> | + | <table width="100%"> |
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
| - | <object width=" | + | <object width="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PDhXE7XbdW4&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PDhXE7XbdW4&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> |
<p align="center"><strong>( 1 )</strong></p> | <p align="center"><strong>( 1 )</strong></p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
| - | <object width=" | + | <object width="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gkSxJamE1-4&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gkSxJamE1-4&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> |
<p align="center"><strong>( 2 )</strong></p> | <p align="center"><strong>( 2 )</strong></p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 21:09, 26 October 2007
 |
 |
 |
| Introduction to EvoGEM | Project Design | Final Results of EvoGEM |
A simple method to evaluate the effectivness of EvoGEM would be to run EvoGEM against several proposed behaviors and see whether or not the simulator can find a circuit or circuits that produce the correct behaviors. However at this point our system is still very naive produces ineffecient circuts (ie designing a circut consisting of 12 parts that should only require 6 parts).
The solution is to take a more comparative approach and specify the behavior required from the circut and then compare the ciructs produced via evolution to previous working systems.
The approach accomplishes two goals. By comparing the evolved circut to a previously completed circut there is no need to test the evolved system in the lab. EvoGEM's results will either match the real world results or not. The other and more interesting accomplishment is that this approach tests the system against human design. Given the final goal of designing a system that generates reliable and effecient ciructs it is very important to see how the evolved circut compares to a human designed one.
Currently our only means of assessing these accomplishments is by qualitatively comparing the results of our 3D graphical simulation to the wetlab results. While this is not ideal it represents an excellent starting point.
|
( 1 ) |
( 2 ) |
