Imperial/Cell by Date/Design
From 2007.igem.org
(→DNA Constructs) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Design Overview == | == Design Overview == | ||
- | [[Image: | + | [[Image:IC07 design CBD-bb.png|center||600px]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
==DNA Constructs== | ==DNA Constructs== | ||
+ | '''Concept 1'''<br /> | ||
+ | [[Image:IC07 design CBDcon1.png|center||550px]] | ||
+ | <br clear="all"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Concept 2'''<br /> | ||
+ | [[Image:IC07 design CBDcon2.png|center||550px]] | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
{|border=1 width=90% align="center" | {|border=1 width=90% align="center" | ||
|- style="background:#eeeeff" | |- style="background:#eeeeff" | ||
Line 84: | Line 91: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br clear="all"> | <br clear="all"> | ||
- | + | --> | |
In previous iGEM projects, Temperature as an input has been explored through cold shock and heat shock promoters. These promoters essentially only operatre for a limited range of temperatures. | In previous iGEM projects, Temperature as an input has been explored through cold shock and heat shock promoters. These promoters essentially only operatre for a limited range of temperatures. | ||
Line 105: | Line 112: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
- | + | # [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/content/full/180/17/4704?view=long&pmid=9721314 Anne Farewell and Frederick C. Neidhardt. Effect of Temperature on In Vivo Protein Synthetic Capacity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1998 September; 180(17): 4704–4710. ] | |
- | [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/content/full/180/17/4704?view=long&pmid=9721314 Anne Farewell and Frederick C. Neidhardt. Effect of Temperature on In Vivo Protein Synthetic Capacity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1998 September; 180(17): 4704–4710. ] | + | # [http://www.clemson.edu/clemsonworld/winter2002/6.htm Kent 2002 : Brief about Vitsab TTI] |
- | + | # [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/151/2/879?view=long&pmid=6178724 J Ryals, R Little, and H Bremer. Temperature Dependence of RNA Synthesis Parameters in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1982 August; 151(2): 879–887. ] | |
- | [http://www.clemson.edu/clemsonworld/winter2002/6.htm Kent 2002 : Brief about Vitsab TTI] | + | |
- | + | ||
- | [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/151/2/879?view=long&pmid=6178724 J Ryals, R Little, and H Bremer. Temperature Dependence of RNA Synthesis Parameters in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1982 August; 151(2): 879–887. ] | + |
Revision as of 03:04, 26 October 2007
Cell by Date : Design
Design Overview
Property | Value | Design Solution | System Level |
Health Regulations | System Must not be living replicating bacteria | Use a Cell Free System e.g. Promega's S30 Cell Extract | Chassis |
Lifespan | System must have a shelf life of 7 days | Protease Inhibitor of Cell Extract should ensure degradation of Visual Reporter is Minimal Proper Packaging should ensure that evaporation of Cell Free system is so low that system can surive for 7 days | Chassis |
Inputs | Isothermal Conditions between 0 & 40 °C | Exploit Thermal Dependance of rates of expression | Construct |
Dynamic conditions eg. steps & ramps | " | Construct | |
Outputs | System should give a visual signal when beef is off | Couple constituitive promoter to a Fluoresent Protein eg. RFP | Construct |
Activation Energy | System Needs to have an activation Energy 30 +/- kJ mol-1 | To be Determined - this is hard to design for | Construct |
Response Time | System needs to have a response time under 1 hour | To be Determined - this is hard to design for | Both |
DNA Constructs
Concept 1
Concept 2
In previous iGEM projects, Temperature as an input has been explored through cold shock and heat shock promoters. These promoters essentially only operatre for a limited range of temperatures.
In making a Time Temperature Integrator we would like a promoter that works over a wide range of temperatures, increasing its rate of protein synthesis as temperature increases. We can realise this behaviour by using a simple constituitive promoter and exploiting the thermal dependance of its rate of synthesis, this type of behaviour has been characterised by Ryals.3
In terms of Activation Energy and Response Time we have been unable to find these in literature and to it is hard to make a design that will achieve these targets. However through the course of our experimentation we will determine these properties and hopefullly their values will suit our interests.
Chassis Selection
We have chosen to use the commerciall available S30 E. coli cell extract made by Promega. After having looking into a variety of different cell-free chassis, we feel that this chassis best suits our needs. In particular this chassis allows us to meet our base requirement of complying with the Health and Safety regulations of the field we are working in, we don't want a live system near our burger meat as potential leak of our system could mean that our system actually spoils the burger meat !!
In addition to complying with health regulations the S30 cell extract is commercially available meaning that it has been shown to work. This is very important for us as it allows our focus to be on tuning the chassis to suit our needs rather than making the chassis work in the first place.
References
- [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/content/full/180/17/4704?view=long&pmid=9721314 Anne Farewell and Frederick C. Neidhardt. Effect of Temperature on In Vivo Protein Synthetic Capacity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1998 September; 180(17): 4704–4710. ]
- [http://www.clemson.edu/clemsonworld/winter2002/6.htm Kent 2002 : Brief about Vitsab TTI]
- [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/151/2/879?view=long&pmid=6178724 J Ryals, R Little, and H Bremer. Temperature Dependence of RNA Synthesis Parameters in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1982 August; 151(2): 879–887. ]