Imperial/Wet Lab/Results/CBD2.1

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (Aims)
m (Results)
Line 20: Line 20:
==Results==
==Results==
{|align="center"
{|align="center"
-
| width="600px"|<br>[[Image:|thumb|600px|Fig.1.1:pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b ''in vivo'' - ]]  
+
| width="600px"|<br>[[Image:IC 2007 ComparisonOfDifferentPackagingMethods.jpg|thumb|600px|Fig.1.1: '''pTet-GFPmut3b''' - fluorescence output for various packaging and sampling techniques, over a period of 6 hours]]  
|}
|}
-
{|align="center"
 
-
| width="600px"|<br>[[Image:.PNG|thumb|600px|]]
 
-
|}
 
'''Controls:'''
'''Controls:'''

Revision as of 23:54, 25 October 2007


Wet Lab: ResultsTest for optimum packaging and sampling techniques

pTet-GFP

Aim

  • Determine an optimum packaging technique for the experiments, that minimises the evaporation of the reaction mixture.
  • Determine a suitable sampling technique which disrupts the reaction to a very minimum


??-??-2007


Materials and Methods

See Protocols page
Tested on (Insert link)

Results


Fig.1.1: pTet-GFPmut3b - fluorescence output for various packaging and sampling techniques, over a period of 6 hours


Controls:

  • Negative Control - 96 well plate with singl layered tape and no pipetting (same experimental conditions as have them usually)

Constants:

  • Temperature - 37°C
  • Volume of Cells sampled - 60µl


Raw Data

Discussion

Conclusion