Imperial/Wet Lab/Lab Notebook/2007-10-05

From 2007.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (5 October 2007)
Line 7: Line 7:
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vivo==
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vivo==
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vivo
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vivo
-
*The protocols for the experiment can be found [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Wet Lab/Protocols/ID1.1|here]]
+
*The protocols for the experiment can be found in the [[Imperial/Wet_Lab/Protocols/ID1.1|Protocols page]] *The [[Imperial/Wet_Lab/Results/ID1.1|results]] of the test showed that pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b is working in vivo and GFPmut3b produced increases with increasing [AHL]
-
*The [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/new pages/in vivo|results]] of the test showed that pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b is working in vivo and GFPmut3b produced increases with increasing [AHL]
+
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vitro==
==pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vitro==
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vitro, for a number of concentrations of AHL
*'''Aim''': The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vitro, for a number of concentrations of AHL
-
*The protocols for the experiment can be found [[IGEM:here|here]]
 
*The [[Media:IC 2007 PLux in-vitro 05-10 25oC.xls|results]] of the test seemed very variable and didn't seemed to comply with the tests that were carried out before. There was a lot of variability between the samples and 4nM of AHL seemed to have fluorescence output greater than 50nM.
*The [[Media:IC 2007 PLux in-vitro 05-10 25oC.xls|results]] of the test seemed very variable and didn't seemed to comply with the tests that were carried out before. There was a lot of variability between the samples and 4nM of AHL seemed to have fluorescence output greater than 50nM.
*It was decided to carry out the experiment again. The reasons for the inaccuracies in the data could have been:
*It was decided to carry out the experiment again. The reasons for the inaccuracies in the data could have been:

Revision as of 18:47, 26 October 2007

5 October 2007

pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vivo

  • Aim: The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vivo
  • The protocols for the experiment can be found in the Protocols page *The results of the test showed that pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFPmut3b is working in vivo and GFPmut3b produced increases with increasing [AHL]

pTet-LuxR-pLux-GFP construct in-vitro

  • Aim: The aim of the test was to check if construct 1 of infector detector works in-vitro, for a number of concentrations of AHL
  • The results of the test seemed very variable and didn't seemed to comply with the tests that were carried out before. There was a lot of variability between the samples and 4nM of AHL seemed to have fluorescence output greater than 50nM.
  • It was decided to carry out the experiment again. The reasons for the inaccuracies in the data could have been:
    • The reaction was not mixed properly or the right amounts were not pipetted
    • The plates had already been used and thus could have affected the reaction